Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Health:
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Howson, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Howson, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Surveillance, knowledge and risk: the embodied experience of cervical screening

Alexandra Howson

University of Aberdeen, UK

Risk and surveillance have emerged as two prominent themes concerning the substantive topic of public health and prevention. While these themes have largely been addressed as discrete issues within the sociology of health and illness, of late there has been a concerted effort to address the relationship between the two. This paper examines an aspect of prevention which is often implicitly identified in terms of both risk and surveillance; that of cervical screening in Britain. First I discuss how risk and surveillance have been brought together in the sociology of health and illness and outline some limitations in their application to substantive topics such as prevention. Second, I introduce cervical screening and proceed with a discussion of textual and interview data which throws light on the status of risk in cervical screening as both an objective and subjective category.

Key Words: cervical screening • gender • governance • prevention • risk

Health:, Vol. 2, No. 2, 195-215 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/136345939800200205


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health (London)Home page
N. Armstrong
Discourse and the individual in cervical cancer screening
Health (London) , January 1, 2007; 11(1): 69 - 85.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
C. Willig
A Discourse-Dynamic Approach to the Study of Subjectivity in Health Psychology
Theory Psychology, August 1, 2000; 10(4): 547 - 570.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nurs EthicsHome page
N. Press, J. R Fishman, and B. A Koenig
Collective Fear, Individualized Risk: the social and cultural context of genetic testing forbreast cancer
Nursing Ethics, May 1, 2000; 7(3): 237 - 249.
[Abstract] [PDF]