Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Health:
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Horsfall, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Horsfall, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Mainstream approaches to mental health and illness: an emphasis on individuals and a de-emphasis of inequalities

Jan Horsfall

University of Sydney, Australia

This theoretical paper argues that structured class, ethnicity and gender factors systematically contribute to people's vulnerability to experiencing a psychiatric disorder. In their denial of group-based contributions to psychiatric problems, mainstream psychiatric disciplines focus on the disturbed individual. It argues that the concept of individualism is a crucial modern European epistemological assumption which underpins definitions of normality and abnormality. An investigation of contemporary mainstream mental health texts reveals their trenchant individualism and the marginalization of life circumstances arising from class, ethnicity and gender relations with regard to assessing, and working with, people with psychiatric difficulties.

The paper argues that modern non-ideal human qualities are associated with the social ‘other’. Middle class, Eurocentric and patriarchal assumptions increase the likelihood that people outside these categories are more likely to receive psychiatric diagnoses. Consequently the discipline of psychiatry constructs the notion of the mad ‘other’. Mainstream mental health nursing, clinical psychology and health psychology support medical psychiatry in individualizing and psychologizing the difficulties experienced by consumers of psychiatric services.

Key Words: class and psychiatry • critique of psy- disciplines • ethnicity and psychiatry • gender and psychiatry • psychiatric epistemology

Health:, Vol. 2, No. 2, 217-231 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/136345939800200206


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?