This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hogan, A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Hogan, A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The business of hearing

University of Sydney, Australia

A controversy surrounds the use of cochlear implant technology as a ‘cure’ for deafness. The deaf community has argued that proponents of speech and hearing (known as oralists) have imposed this technology on deaf people as part of their mission to eradicate deafness and therefore the deaf community. The use of power is at issue within this debate, where power may be taken to mean something that is possessed or something that is exercised. For the deaf community, cochlear implants have come to be used because oralists simply had the power to do so. This article contests this position. It offers a description of the development of the social process that has permitted and legitimated the production of a form of social relations that privileges the use of cochlear implants over sign language. Within this analysis it can be seen that the oralists’ capacity and opportunity to act resulted from their ability to build collaborative networks with a variety of actors, both individual and institutional. This understanding of power as exercised, forms an integral part of a broader framework for understanding the governance of deafness.

Key Words: cochlear implants • deafness • governance • power

Health:, Vol. 2, No. 4, 485-501 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/136345939800200405


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?