This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Duncan, B. Articles by Scoular, A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Duncan, B. Articles by Scoular, A. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Screening and the Construction of Scepticism: The Case of Chlamydia

University of Strathclyde, MRC Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow & North Glasgow Hospitals University NHS Trustbarbara.duncan{at}strath.ac.uk

Graham Hart

Anne Scoular

University of Strathclyde, MRC Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow & North Glasgow Hospitals University NHS Trust

Screening for disease is an integral component of UK preventative health policy, and there are proposals to introduce a screening programme for the sexually transmitted infection Chlamydia trachomatis. In recent years, however, debates over screening have been characterized by increasing scepticism about the individual benefits of participating in such initiatives. This article explores factors that may contribute to this scepticism, in the context of a study that investigated the experience of women who had been diagnosed with chlamydia. We employ Bury’s concept of ‘risk to meanings’ to understand better the social process of the development of uncertainty in relation to a positive diagnosis. Three themes related to uncertainty and the ‘risk to meaning’ are explored here – the threat to self-image, disclosing diagnosis and anxiety about future health status. The implications for the proposed UK chlamydia screening programme are discussed, and the article suggests that the development and construction of scepticism occurs in the space between expectations stimulated by public health discourses of screening and the lived experience of individuals.

Key Words: risk • screening • sexually transmitted infections • uncertainty

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?