Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Health:
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Franklin, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Franklin, S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Culturing Biology: Cell Lines for the Second Millennium

Sarah Franklin

Lancaster University, UKs.franklin{at}lancaster.ac.uk

Public concerns about innovative biomedical health technologies, such as human therapeutic cloning, have been the subject of a rapidly expanding social scientific literature. A prominent argument within much of this literature is that ‘the social’ is itself undergoing fundamental transformation in the context of what some have called ‘the age of biological control’. This article interrogates the question of how social relationality is being transformed, or relocated, within the cell line itself by examining the recent merger between Geron Corporation and Roslin Biomed. Arguing certain social concerns are being built in to the cell line, the question of ‘biological control’ is refigured as one of social relationality.

Key Words: animal models • cloning • Roslin Institute • social ethics • stem cells

Health:, Vol. 5, No. 3, 335-354 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/136345930100500304
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Theory Culture SocietyHome page
S. Franklin
The Cyborg Embryo: Our Path to Transbiology
Theory Culture Society, December 1, 2006; 23(7-8): 167 - 187.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Anthropological TheoryHome page
S. Franklin
Re-thinking nature--culture: Anthropology and the new genetics
Anthropological Theory, March 1, 2003; 3(1): 65 - 85.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Body SocietyHome page
A. PETERSEN
Replicating Our Bodies, Losing Our Selves: News Media Portrayals of Human Cloning in the Wake of Dolly
Body Society, December 1, 2002; 8(4): 71 - 90.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Health (London)Home page
C. Waldby
Stem Cells, Tissue Cultures and the Production of Biovalue
Health (London) , July 1, 2002; 6(3): 305 - 323.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Social Studies of ScienceHome page
C. Waldby
Code Unknown: Histories of the Gene
Social Studies of Science, October 1, 2001; 31(5): 779 - 791.
[PDF]