Health:

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stevenson, F. A.
Right arrow Articles by Barber, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Stevenson, F. A.
Right arrow Articles by Barber, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Health:, Vol. 6, No. 1, 85-104 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/136345930200600105

Perceptions of Legitimacy: The Influence on Medicine Taking and Prescribing

Fiona A. Stevenson

King’s College London, King’s College London, Brunel University, University College Cork and London Universityf.stevenson{at}pcps.ucl.ac.uk

Nicky Britten

Christine A. Barry

Colin P. Bradley

Nick Barber

King’s College London, King’s College London, Brunel University, University College Cork and London University

The terms non-compliance or non-adherence, in relation to medicine taking, contain the assumption that prescribers’ actions are legitimate and should be perceived as such by patients, and that non-adherence is deviant. Yet the high level of non-adherence suggests that patients do not necessarily perceive prescriptions in this way. We consider the relevance today of viewing non-adherence in terms of Weber’s concept of legitimacy. We also consider the more recent concept of concordance. Drawing on an analysis of interviews and consultations from a study of doctor–patient communication about drugs, we argue that decisions about prescribing and medicine taking are complex and take account of social as well as medical criteria. Moreover, any attempt to understand adherence needs to be flexible enough to encompass both a Weberian as well as a concordance approach to prescribing and medicine taking.

Key Words: adherence • concordance • legitimation • Weber


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health (London)Home page
A. Rogers, D. Pilgrim, S. Brennan, I. Sulaiman, G. Watson, and C. Chew-Graham
Prescribing benzodiazepines in general practice: a new view of an old problem
Health (London) , April 1, 2007; 11(2): 181 - 198.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
C. A. Barry
Multiple Realities in a Study of Medical Consultations
Qual Health Res, October 1, 2002; 12(8): 1093 - 1111.
[Abstract] [PDF]