Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Health:
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Galvin, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Galvin, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Disturbing Notions of Chronic Illness and Individual Responsibility: Towards a Genealogy of Morals

Rose Galvin

Woolgoolga, NSW, Australiarose{at}midcoast.com.au

This article seeks to demonstrate that chronic illness is increasingly being viewed as culpability in the face of known risks, an instance of moral failure that requires the intervention of a range of political technologies. I argue that, in many western nations, it is becoming less acceptable to enter and remain in a physically incapacitated state: it clashes too uncomfortably with the image of the ‘good citizen’ as someone who actively participates in social and economic life, makes rational choices and is independent, self-reliant and responsible. By engaging in a genealogical analysis of chronic illness and individual responsibility, exploring how they are placed within the framework of contemporary ‘risk-society’, employing the insights derived from recent governmentality studies and developing a case study based on the current Australian experience with health promotion and welfare reform, I investigate the ways in which the concepts of health and illness are currently being deployed as tools of ‘government’.

Key Words: chronic illness • genealogy • moral responsibility • neoliberal governance • risk

Health:, Vol. 6, No. 2, 107-137 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/136345930200600201


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health (London)Home page
D. A. Nicholls, J. A. Walton, and K. Price
Making breathing your business: enterprising practices at the margins of orthodoxy
Health (London) , May 1, 2009; 13(3): 337 - 360.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational PolicyHome page
C. Vander Schee
The Politics of Health as a School-Sponsored Ethic: Foucault, Neoliberalism, and the Unhealthy Employee
Educational Policy, November 1, 2008; 22(6): 854 - 874.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
J. Cheek
Healthism: A New Conservatism?
Qual Health Res, July 1, 2008; 18(7): 974 - 982.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
Y. H. Cheng
Against the Odds or Odds-On Chance: Pathways of Coming Back Among Hand-Injured Workers in the Chinese Context
Qual Health Res, June 1, 2008; 18(6): 843 - 852.
[Abstract] [PDF]