This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Wolf, J. H. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Wolf, J. H. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

‘Mighty Glad to Gasp in the Gas’: Perceptions of Pain and the Traditional Timing of Obstetric Anesthesia

Ohio University, USAwolfj1{at}ohio.edu

Medical historians have long argued that while birth remained in the home women controlled the event. However, a detailed examination of the prevalent use of obstetric anesthesia beginning in the late 19th century indicates that parturients allowed physicians to define appropriate obstetric treatment even when home birth was still the norm and that this deference led to the use of obstetric anesthesia in a manner that made no physiological sense. For at least 70 years beginning in the 1890s, physicians did not anesthetize women during transition, the most painful portion of labor. Rather, they rendered women unconscious at the moment of birth. Physicians based this therapeutically useless but long sacrosanct medical practice on what they presumed women felt, given the disturbing way women looked at the moment of birth. Women accepted this practice because they were ignorant of the sensations of birth. Thus physicians’ and women’s perceptions of labor pain, rather than reality, have played a major historic role in shaping the administration of obstetric anesthesia.

Key Words: history • labor pain • obstetric anesthesia • obstetrics

Health:, Vol. 6, No. 3, 365-387 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/136345930200600307


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?