| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Evidence-Based Medicine: Ambivalent Reading and the Clinical Recontextualization of ScienceDalhousie University, Canada eric.mykhalovskiy{at}dal.ca This article contributes to the investigation of evidence-based medicine (EBM) as text-mediated relations of governance. Social critiques of EBM typically rely on a negative conception of power, such that EBM is considered to contain or limit the scope of medical practice. This article, by contrast, explores EBM as a productive relation, one that governs through medicine's `freedom' and opens up spaces of intervention. The article draws on an institutional ethnographic study of a research transfer initiative called informed - an evidence-based newsletter for family physicians. My investigation of the work practices of making informed underscores how texts are fundamental to the social organization of EBM. Through the example of informed, I locate reading as a central object of governance within EBM. I emphasize how the problematization of physicians as indifferent readers is linked with an effort to intervene in medical work through a new kind of text that clinically recontextualizes biomedical science.
Key Words: clinical practice evidence-based medicine governmentality institutional ethnography physicians reading texts
Health:, Vol. 7, No. 3,
331-352 (2003) This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||
